Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 68, Issue 5 , Pages 1018-1024, May 2010

Analgesic and Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Oxaprozin and Naproxen Sodium After Removal of Impacted Lower Third Molars: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study

Presented in part at the 15th International Congress of Turkish Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Antalya, Turkey, October 29 - November 2, 2008.

  • İsa M. Kara, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Kara: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, 27310, Gaziantep, Turkey
  • ,
  • Serkan Polat, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey
  • ,
  • Fatih İnce, MD

      Affiliations

    • Research Assistant, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey
  • ,
  • Cesur Gümüş, MD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey

published online 08 March 2010.

Purpose

In this study, oxaprozin, a long-acting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and naproxen sodium were compared in terms of their effects on edema, pain, and trismus after surgery for impacted mandibular third molars.

Materials and Methods

Thirty healthy patients with bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars were included in this randomized, cross-over, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 surgery groups and received postoperatively 1,200 mg oxaprozin, 550 mg naproxen sodium, or a placebo. Postoperative edema was measured with ultrasonography performed before and after surgery. Trismus was measured by comparison of preoperative and postoperative maximum interincisal mouth opening measurements by caliper. Pain was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS) and by recording the number of rescue analgesic pills taken.

Results

After removal of impacted third molars, the patients administered oxaprozin and naproxen showed superior results over those given placebo in terms of pain parameters (P < .05), but these treatments had no statistically significant effect on facial swelling. Comparing the oxaprozin and naproxen groups, there were no differences in the mouth opening measurements, but naproxen showed a statistically superior effect over the placebo (P < .05). Although not statistically significant, oxaprozin showed a more pronounced effect in reducing trismus than did the placebo (P = .07).

Conclusions

Administration of either oxaprozin or naproxen sodium during the postoperative period is effective and has similar effects in reducing pain but questionable benefit for the management of trismus. However, neither agent has clinical benefit in terms of reducing edema.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(09)01836-9

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.094

Refers to erratum:

  • Erratum , 10 October 2011

    Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery December 2011 (Vol. 69, Issue 12, Page 3051)

  • Erratum

    Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery August 2010 (Vol. 68, Issue 8, Page 2036)

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 68, Issue 5 , Pages 1018-1024, May 2010