Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 68, Issue 5 , Pages 969-974, May 2010

A Novel Surgical Approach to Impacted Mandibular Third Molars to Reduce the Risk of Paresthesia: A Case Series

  • Luca Landi, DDS, CAGS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Landi: Via Della Balduina 114, 00136 Roma, Italy
  • ,
  • Paolo Francesco Manicone, DDS

      Affiliations

    • PhD Resident, Department of Orthodontics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Stefano Piccinelli, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Alessandro Raia, DDS

      Affiliations

    • PhD Resident, Department of Orthodontics, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, and Private Practice, Studio di Odontoiatria Ricostruttiva, Rome, Italy
  • ,
  • Roberto Raia, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Private Practice, Studio di Odontoiatria Ricostruttiva, Rome, Italy

published online 16 February 2010.

Purpose

Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars (M3s) may cause temporary or permanent neurosensorial disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Although the incidence of this complication is low, a great range of variability has been reported in the literature. Several methods to reduce or eliminate this complication have been proposed, such as orthodontic-assisted extraction, extraction of the second molar, or intentional odontoectomy. The purpose of this series of cases is to present a novel approach for a riskless extraction of impacted mandibular M3s in contact with the IAN.

Materials and Methods

Nine consecutive patients (4 male and 5 female; mean age 24.9 years, range 18-43 years) required the extraction of 10 horizontally or mesioangular impacted mandibular M3s. In all cases the M3 was in contact with the IAN with a high risk of nerve injury. A staged approached was proposed and accepted by the patients. This approach consisted in the surgical removal of the mesial portion of the anatomic crown to create adequate space for mesial M3 migration. After the migration of the M3 had taken place, the extraction could then be accomplished in a second surgical session minimizing neurological risks.

Results

All M3s moved mesially within 6 months (mean 174.1 days, range 92-354 days) and could be successfully removed without any neurological consequences.

Conclusion

This technique may be considered as an alternative approach to the extraction of horizontally or mesioangular impacted M3s in proximity to the IAN.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0278-2391(09)01852-7

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.097

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 68, Issue 5 , Pages 969-974, May 2010