Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 68, Issue 5 , Pages 1131-1139 , May 2010

Cell Response of Titanium Implant With a Roughened Surface Containing Titanium Hydride: An In Vitro Study

  • Feng Zhang, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Resident Doctor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    • ,
  • Gou-li Yang, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Attending Doctor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    • ,
  • Fu-ming He, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Associate Chief Physician, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    • ,
  • Li-juan Zhang, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Resident Doctor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    • ,
  • Shi-fang Zhao, MD, DDS

      Affiliations

    • Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Zhao: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Stomatology Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 395 Yan'an Road, Hangzhou, China 310006

References 

  1. Le Guehennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, et al. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater. 2007;23:844
  2. Masuda T, Yliheikkila PK, Felton DA, et al. Generalizations regarding the process and phenomenon of osseointegration (Part I. In vivo studies). Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:17
  3. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Resonance frequency analysis: Measuring implant stability and osseointegration. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998;19:493
  4. Weinstein RL, Francetti L, Sironi R. An analysis of the diagnostic criteria in assessing peri-implant tissues (A critical analysis of the literature). Minerva Stomatol. 1996;45:219;(in Italian)
  5. Zhao L, Wu Z, Zhang Y. Low-magnitude mechanical vibration may be applied clinically to promote dental implant osseointegration. Med Hypotheses. 2009;72:451
  6. Zreiqat H, Valenzuela SM, Nissan BB, et al. The effect of surface chemistry modification of titanium alloy on signalling pathways in human osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 2005;26:7579
  7. Boyan BD, Hummert TW, Dean DD, et al. Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. Biomaterials. 1996;17:137
  8. Li D, Ferguson SJ, Beutler T, et al. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60:325
  9. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res. 2004;83:529
  10. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;45:75
  11. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, et al. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants (A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs). J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:889
  12. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, et al. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;40:1
  13. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, et al. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: A prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;12:572
  14. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:144
  15. Bornstein MM, Lussi A, Schmid B, et al. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 3-Year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:659
  16. Sul YT, Kang BS, Johansson C, et al. The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;89:942
  17. Perrin D, Szmukler-Moncler S, Echikou C, et al. Bone response to alteration of surface topography and surface composition of sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:465
  18. Taborelli M, Jobin M, Francois P, et al. Influence of surface treatments developed for oral implants on the physical and biological properties of titanium ((I) Surface characterization). Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:208
  19. Aronsson BO, Hjorvarsson B, Frauchiger L, et al. Hydrogen desorption from sand-blasted and acid-etched titanium surfaces after glow-discharge treatment. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;54:20
  20. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 1—Review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:536
  21. Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C, et al. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:341
  22. Sul YT, Johansson C, Wennerberg A, et al. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: Surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:349
  23. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2—Review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;17:544
  24. Davies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont. 1998;11:391
  25. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, et al. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:251
  26. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol. 1999;70:1523
  27. Veis AA, Trisi P, Papadimitriou S, et al. Osseointegration of Osseotite and machined titanium implants in autogenous bone graft (A histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:54
  28. Puleo DA, Holleran LA, Doremus RH, et al. Osteoblast responses to orthopedic implant materials in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res. 1991;25:711
  29. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2000;21:667
  30. Lamolle SF, Monjo M, Rubert M, et al. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment of titanium surface on nanostructural and chemical changes and the growth of MC3T3-E1 cells. Biomaterials. 2009;30:736
  31. Cui X, Kim HM, Kawashita M, et al. Effect of hot water and heat treatment on the apatite-forming ability of titania films formed on titanium metal via anodic oxidation in acetic acid solutions. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:1767
  32. Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, et al. Preparation of bioactive Ti and its alloys via simple chemical surface treatment. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996;32:409
  33. Nishio K, Neo M, Akiyama H, et al. The effect of alkali- and heat-treated titanium and apatite-formed titanium on osteoblastic differentiation of bone marrow cells. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;52:652

PII: S0278-2391(10)00059-5

doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.12.027

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume 68, Issue 5 , Pages 1131-1139 , May 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution