Advertisement

Zygomatico-Orbital Fracture-Dislocation in Surgical Treatment: Novel 3-Dimensional Software Automated Analysis

Published:March 24, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2020.03.016

      Purpose

      The human capability to detect the degree of zygomatico-orbital (ZMO) fracture-dislocation in surgical treatment is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between ZMO fracture-dislocation and injury etiology and treatment.

      Materials and Methods

      We implemented a retrospective cross-sectional study, enrolled a sample composed of patients with an isolated unilateral ZMO fracture, and analyzed fracture-dislocation from computed tomography images with an automatic algorithm. The primary predictor variable was mean surface point-to-point dislocation (the mean distance of dislocation for all surface points in isolated ZMO fracture segments between the original position and after virtual repositioning). The primary outcome was the treatment choice (operative vs nonoperative). Other studied variables were gender, age group, injury mechanism, clinical asymmetry, and human-evaluated dislocation on computed tomography images. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were computed, and the threshold for statistical significance was set at P < .05.

      Results

      The sample consisted of 115 patients with a mean age of 66.3 years, 66.1% of whom were male patients, and the most common cause of injury was falling on the ground (49.6%). Operative treatment was required in 58 patients (50.4%). A significant association was found between mean dislocation and operative treatment. Mean dislocation of operatively versus nonoperatively treated fractures was 2.39 mm versus 1.05 mm (P < .001). Mean fracture-dislocation was greatest in injuries caused by assault (2.41 mm) and smallest in motor vehicle accidents (1.08 mm) and ground-level falls (1.25 mm). The threshold of human-eye detection for ZMO fracture-dislocation was 1.97 mm.

      Conclusions

      The results of this study demonstrate that the threshold for operative treatment of ZMO fracture-dislocation is over 2 mm, which the human eye is able to detect. True dislocation is greater in younger patients than elderly patients and in injuries caused by assault compared with falling.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Boffano P.
        • Roccia F.
        • Zavattero E.
        • et al.
        European Maxillofacial Trauma (EURMAT) project: A multicentre and prospective study.
        J Craniomaxillofacial Surg. 2015; 43: 62
        • Al-Khateeb T.
        • Abdullah F.M.
        Craniomaxillofacial injuries in the United Arab Emirates: A retrospective study.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65: 1094
        • Bogusiak K.
        • Arkuszewski P.
        Characteristics and epidemiology of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21: 1018
        • Ellis E.
        • El-Attar A.
        • Moos K.F.
        An Analysis of 2,067 cases of zygomatico-orbital fracture.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985; 43: 417
        • Calderoni D.R.
        • Guidi M.D.C.
        • Kharmandayan P.
        • Nunes P.H.F.
        Seven-year institutional experience in the surgical treatment of orbito-zygomatic fractures.
        J Craniomaxillofacial Surg. 2011; 39: 593
        • Moreira Marinho R.O.
        • Freire-Maia B.
        Management of fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary complex.
        Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013; 25: 617
        • Knight J.S.
        • North J.F.
        The classification of malar fractures: An analysis of displacement as a guide to treatment.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1960; 13: 325
        • Zingg M.
        • Laedrach K.
        • Chen J.
        • et al.
        Classification and treatment of zygomatic fractures: A review of 1,025 cases.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992; 50: 778
        • Fujii N.
        • Yamashiro M.
        Classification of malar complex fractures using computed tomography.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1983; 41: 562
        • Olate S.
        • Lima S.M.
        • Sawazaki R.
        • et al.
        Surgical approaches and fixation patterns in zygomatic complex fractures.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21: 1213
        • Kelley P.
        • Hopper R.
        • Gruss J.
        Evaluation and treatment of zygomatic fractures.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120: 5
        • Kurita M.
        • Okazaki M.
        • Ozaki M.
        • et al.
        Patient satisfaction after open reduction and internal fixation of zygomatic bone fractures.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21: 45
        • Hwang K.
        One-point fixation of tripod fractures of zygoma through a lateral brow incision.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2010; 21: 1042
        • Toriumi M.
        • Nagasao T.
        • Itamiya T.
        • et al.
        3-D analysis of dislocation in zygoma fractures.
        J Craniomaxillofacial Surg. 2014; 42: 397
        • Pau C.Y.
        • Barrera J.E.
        • Kwon J.
        Most SP: Three-dimensional analysis of zygomatic-maxillary complex fracture patterns.
        Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2010; 3: 167
        • Toivari M.
        • Snäll J.
        • Suominen A.L.
        • et al.
        Associated injuries are frequent and severe among geriatric patients with zygomatico-orbital fractures.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 77: 565
        • Sun C.
        Symmetry detection using gradient information.
        Pattern Recognit Lett. 1995; 16: 987
        • Gibelli D.
        • Cellina M.
        • Gibelli S.
        • et al.
        Assessing symmetry of zygomatic bone through three-dimensional segmentation on computed tomography scan and “mirroring” procedure: A contribution for reconstructive maxillofacial surgery.
        J Craniomaxillofacial Surg. 2018; 46: 600
        • Salentijn E.G.
        • Boverhoff J.
        • Heymans M.W.
        • et al.
        The clinical and radiographical characteristics of zygomatic complex fractures: A comparison between the surgically and non-surgically treated patients.
        J Craniomaxillofacial Surg. 2014; 42: 492
        • Salentijn E.
        • Boffano P.
        • Boverhoff J.
        • et al.
        The epidemiological characteristics of zygomatic complex fractures: A comparison between the surgically and non-surgically treated patients.
        Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 4: 214
        • Olate S.
        • Lima S.M.
        • Sawazaki R.
        • et al.
        Variables related to surgical and nonsurgical treatment of zygomatic complex fracture.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2011; 22: 1200
        • Kaufman Y.
        • Stal D.
        • Cole P.
        • Hollier L.
        Orbitozygomatic fracture management.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 1370
        • Feng F.
        • Wang H.
        • Guan X.
        • et al.
        Mirror imaging and preshaped titanium plates in the treatment of unilateral malar and zygomatic arch fractures.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011; 112: 188
        • Lerhe B.
        • Alshehri S.
        • Ferachon D.
        • et al.
        Tomographic osteometry of the zygomatic bone applied to traumatology of facial bones: Preliminary retrospective study of zygomatic summit in 28 patients.
        J Craniomaxillofacial Surg. 2017; 45: 150
        • Khaqani M.S.
        • Tavosi F.
        • Gholami M.
        • et al.
        Analysis of facial symmetry after zygomatic bone fracture management.
        J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 76: 595